Not happy with Workwize? 6 stronger IT Asset Management alternatives

Choosing the right IT asset management platform for your distributed team is critical to running operations smoothly. While Workwize promises a seamless, zero-touch experience, many users have shared frustrating experiences with the platform:

“Workwize offers a zero-touch experience for employees, but their feature doesn’t work—the employee cannot choose the equipment. The platform is not functioning properly. Delivery time is 2–3 weeks for Western Europe, and there is no global coverage.”

Another user echoed similar concerns:

“The user interface is clunky and outdated. Features are limited compared to other platforms. I found myself frustrated with the lack of customization and the slow loading times. I wouldn’t recommend Workwize to anyone looking for a reliable and efficient project management platform.”

If you’re encountering the same issues, it may be time to explore alternative options. And you wouldn’t be alone: the global IT asset management market is projected to grow from $ 1.97 billion in 2024 to $2.68 billion by 2029, highlighting just how many businesses are rethinking their IT operations.

Here are six Workwize alternatives that offer stronger global coverage, faster support, more intuitive platforms, and actually deliver what they promise.

6 Workwize alternatives to consider

1. GroWrk

Best for global IT Asset Management without the guesswork

If Workwize’s “zero-touch” promise has left you dealing with broken workflows and delayed deliveries, GroWrk might be exactly what you’re looking for. Since 2019, GroWrk has helped distributed teams in 150+ countries deploy, retrieve, store, and dispose of IT equipment with speed and transparency. Unlike Workwize, it actually delivers on what it promises.

Why teams switch from Workwize to GroWrk

• Proven reliability: Workwize’s inconsistent SLAs and missing features frustrate teams that need predictable performance. GroWrk meets a 99.5% delivery SLA across its global logistics network—without hidden fees or long delays.

• Real integrations, not just logos: While Workwize has struggled with HR tool integrations like BambooHR, GroWrk offers 40+ native integrations that actually work—spanning payroll, ITAM tools, MDMs, and HR platforms.

• Clear ownership and flexible lifecycle options: Unlike Hofy or Workwize’s leasing models, GroWrk lets you own your devices and choose between recycling, buyback, or redeployment.

• Responsive support: Instead of chasing down Workwize tickets, GroWrk users get dedicated agents, live chat, and an AI assistant that solves issues fast.

Best for

Companies that need extensive global coverage, working integrations, and support they don’t have to beg for.

Pros

• Covers 150+ countries with local warehousing

• Transparent pricing and zero implementation fees

• 40+ native integrations that actually connect

• Multiple disposal and reuse options

• SOC 2 certified with real-time asset tracking

Cons

• Most cost-effective for teams managing 50+ employees

• Some workflows require light onboarding to configure fully

2. Hofy (Now Deel IT)

Best for fast deployments—If you don’t mind the tradeoffs

Hofy positions itself as a quick IT equipment solution for distributed teams—and in many ways, it delivers. But if you’ve hit limitations with pricing clarity, device ownership, or true global reach, you’re not alone.

While it offers coverage in 120+ countries, Hofy’s leasing model and tiered pricing structure can make long-term scaling tricky and expensive—especially if you're looking for flexibility or need consistent service in less accessible regions.

Why teams switch from Hofy to GroWrk

• You own your devices: Hofy leases hardware, which can restrict flexibility for repurposing or reselling. GroWrk lets you own the hardware and manage the full lifecycle—procure, deploy, retrieve, redeploy, or recycle.

• Clearer pricing: Hofy’s extra charges for support, configuration, and maintenance can add up quickly. GroWrk offers straightforward, all-inclusive pricing with no onboarding fees or billing surprises.

• Wider global footprint: Hofy does well in major markets—but GroWrk’s 150+ country coverage includes remote regions and emerging markets where Hofy often falls short.

Best for

Companies that need fast hardware deployment in common regions and are okay with leasing limitations.

Pros

• Quick lead times in core countries

• Automation-friendly workflows

• Deel acquisition may accelerate development

Cons

• Leasing-only model limits flexibility

• Higher fees for basic support and services

• Spotty coverage outside of North America and Europe

3. Firstbase

Best for simple deployments—But limited if you’re scaling globally

Firstbase is all about ease. Their zero-touch deployment is great for getting devices into employees' hands with minimal effort. But when it comes to global logistics, advanced lifecycle management, or transparent pricing, it starts to show some cracks—especially when compared to platforms like GroWrk.

If you're expanding beyond a few regions or want more control over support, asset recovery, and reuse, Firstbase can feel more like a starter solution than a long-term partner.

Why teams switch from Firstbase to GroWrk

• Wider global coverage: Firstbase doesn’t offer the same consistency across geographies. GroWrk supports 150+ countries with uniform SLAs, making it a better fit for truly distributed teams.

• Transparent pricing, no onboarding fees: Firstbase tacks on setup and onboarding charges. GroWrk skips all that—and still gives you custom workflows, integrations, and support.

• More lifecycle control: Firstbase does delivery and retrieval well, but GroWrk adds buyback options, data sanitization, secure disposal, and full audit trails.

Best for

Startups or mid-size teams prioritizing fast, hands-off deployments in a few key regions.

Pros

• Straightforward user experience

• Strong zero-touch fulfillment

• Good for early-stage distributed teams

Cons

• Limited international support

• Extra costs for onboarding and support

• Fewer platform features (e.g. no AI chatbot, depreciation tracking, or flexible reuse options)

4. Allwhere

Best for basic IT management—But still a work in progress

Allwhere aims to cover the IT asset lifecycle—procurement, deployment, maintenance, and disposal—in one platform. But in practice, it’s still building out core features and struggling to match the consistency and coverage you’d get from more mature solutions like GroWrk.

If you're managing teams across regions like LATAM, APAC, or anywhere outside the U.S. and Europe, Allwhere’s limitations can quickly become blockers.

Why teams switch from Allwhere to GroWrk

• Stronger global presence: Allwhere’s service in regions like South America or Southeast Asia is inconsistent. GroWrk operates in 150+ countries with local warehousing and clear SLAs.

• More mature platform: Expense tracking, legal holds, depreciation tracking—GroWrk has them. Allwhere doesn’t (yet).

• Support that scales: GroWrk gives every customer a real support team and an AI chatbot. Allwhere’s response times are slower and less structured.

Best for

Companies looking for a basic ITAM platform but without urgent needs for deep integrations or broad international coverage.

Pros

• Covers the full IT lifecycle

• Real-time tracking included

• Intuitive interface for simple needs

Cons

• Limited feature set compared to GroWrk

• Slower customer support

• Patchy international logistics

5. Retriever

Best for simple returns—But that’s where It ends

Retriever focuses on one thing: getting laptops and monitors back from remote employees. And it does that well—padded boxes, prepaid labels, tracking, the whole works. But if you need anything beyond retrieval, you’ll quickly hit a wall.

Unlike GroWrk, Retriever doesn’t offer procurement, deployment, asset storage, or true lifecycle management. It’s a one-trick pony—and not built for scaling global operations.

Why teams switch from Retriever to GroWrk

• One platform for everything: GroWrk handles the full asset lifecycle—procurement, deployment, retrieval, storage, data wiping, and disposal. Retriever only does returns.

• Global reach vs. regional focus: Retriever operates mainly in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. GroWrk works in 150+ countries with local compliance and logistics baked in.

• Better visibility: While Retriever tracks returns, GroWrk gives you full audit logs, device-level status, and integration with your IT systems for end-to-end visibility.

Best for

U.S.-based companies that only need a tool for laptop retrieval—nothing more.

Pros

• Reliable return process

• Secure packaging and prepaid shipping

• Good fit for simple offboarding

Cons

• No procurement or deployment

• No support for non-U.S./UK/CA regions

• No asset tracking or lifecycle management

6. Asset Panda

Best for tracking—Not for managing your IT assets

Asset Panda is a flexible platform for logging and monitoring physical assets, and it shines when it comes to barcode scanning and customizable workflows. But if you're expecting full IT asset lifecycle support—procurement, deployment, recovery, disposal—you’re going to be disappointed.

Asset Panda doesn’t offer hardware logistics, device retrieval, or any hands-on ITAM services. So if you're running a distributed team or trying to centralize your device operations, you'll need another platform to fill in the gaps.

Why teams switch from Asset Panda to GroWrk

• Full-service vs. just tracking: GroWrk handles the full lifecycle of IT assets. Asset Panda stops at tracking—you’ll still need a separate vendor for logistics, retrievals, or provisioning.

• Global IT support: Asset Panda isn’t built for companies with distributed teams. GroWrk is, with on-the-ground logistics and support in 150+ countries.

• Automation and integrations: GroWrk offers real integrations with HR, IT, and finance systems—plus AI-driven support. Asset Panda is more limited on the automation front.

Best for

Small teams that just need inventory tracking—not end-to-end IT asset management.

Pros

• Great for asset logging and barcode scanning

• Customizable fields and workflows

• Strong reporting

Cons

• No procurement, shipping, or recovery features

• No international logistics

• Not designed for modern ITAM lifecycle needs

Why businesses choose GroWrk for IT Asset Management

If Workwize has left you chasing support tickets, managing delays, or working around missing features, GroWrk offers a better path forward. 

• End-to-end lifecycle management: Everything runs through one streamlined platform from procurement to disposal.

• Consistent global coverage: No gaps, no guesswork—just reliable logistics and fulfillment in 150+ countries.

• Secure, compliant retrievals: Certified data wiping, audit-ready documentation, and environmentally responsible recycling.

• Unmatched visibility: Real-time asset tracking, reporting, and insights that help IT and ops teams stay in control.

• Support that scales: Live agents, AI-powered assistance, and no waiting around for ticket responses.

Ready for IT asset Management that works? Book a demo and see why global teams trust GroWrk to simplify their hardware operations.