SLA by country
Know timelines before you buy
5 to 7 business days (typical)
Faster SLAs worldwide. Transparent billing. Real lifecycle control.
Country-level SLAs, itemized invoices (no shipping markups), and deep lifecycle automation—procure to EOL.
Know timelines before you buy
5 to 7 business days (typical)
Itemized logistics, duties, taxes
No surprise costs; approvals + audit trail
Local sourcing & compliance
One platform, consistent experience
| GroWrk | Workwize | |
|---|---|---|
| Global SLAs & reliability | Country-level SLAs with milestone tracking (procure → customs → doorstep). |
Multiple public reviews report missed/rarely met SLAs and delivery/collection struggles outside the US—especially EU, AU, India, South America. [1] (G2)
|
| Pickups/returns (LATAM/APAC) | Timestamped retrieval SLAs; chain-of-custody logs. |
Users note slower courier pickups in LATAM and parts of APAC; need more depots. [2] (G2)
|
| Order visibility | Supplier PO mapping + serials pre-attached to user; live status. |
Reviewers cite "no meaningful updates," no link between Workwize order # and supplier order #; slow serial number entry. [3] (Capterra)
|
| Implementation timing | Pilot live in weeks with mirrored approvals; migration playbook. |
Reports of implementations taking months longer than anticipated. [1] (G2)
|
| Integration maturity | HRIS/MDM automations; robust API; auto-onboarding/offboarding. |
Mentions of limited auto-onboarding, API depth, and limited offboarding geos. [4] (Capterra)
|
| Bugs/UI limits | Enterprise-grade QA; roadmaped customization. |
Some reviews note bugs/mismapped assets and limited storefront customization. [2][5] (G2)
|
| Total cost to serve | A-la-carte (no platform fee) or Flex; logistics billed at carrier cost (transparent pricing). |
Practitioners report platform fees and ~30% product markups; some chose a VAR (e.g., CDW) on cost. [6] (Reddit) |
• 100% SLA compliance on returns
• 230+ onboardings with clear approvals
Read the case study15-minute peer chat—ask about rollout, EU/AU/India SLAs, LATAM/APAC pickups, order visibility, and invoice clarity.
Book a peer chatMicro-agenda: 1) context, 2) migration timeline, 3) SLAs by country, 4) invoice/PO mapping, 5) lessons learned
No platform fee
• Pay only for services used
• Carrier-cost logistics (transparent pricing)
• Ideal to start or supplement ops
See a sample invoicePredictable per-device
• Only billed when a service is requested
• Scales by region; monthly reporting
• Approvals & audit exports
Get a tailored quoteSLA timer starts on payment confirmation for procured items.
Map workflows/approvals/SKUs; export assets/users/locations.
Run onboarding + retrieval in 2 countries with mirrored approvals; track SLA adherence.
Expand globally; monitor tickets, cycle time, and per-order cost transparency.
Global logistics
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Limited global presence, often fewer countries covered |
|
|
Fragmented logistics causing delays and inefficiencies |
|
|
|
Full device lifecycle management
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Lifecycle coverage exists but fragmented across workflows |
|
|
Tracking limited, with fewer actionable insights |
|
|
Reliance on manual intervention for key stages of the device journey |
Advanced device management
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Developing MDM features, but limited depth and OS coverage |
|
|
Some automation tools, though platform maturity is still evolving |
|
|
Compliance controls less advanced, leaving gaps against enterprise standards |
Speed to deploy
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Delivery timelines often exceed two weeks, varying by region |
|
|
Devices may arrive unconfigured, adding setup delays |
|
|
Shipment visibility limited, with manual tracking dependencies |
Comprehensive IT support
|
GroWrk
|
Workwize
|
|
|
Support hours limited by region, not truly global |
|
|
Relies on third-party partners for certain services |
|
|
Response times vary, with no clear SLA commitments |
Scalability
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Limited scalability due to regional restrictions |
|
|
Minimal customization options for roles or teams |
|
|
Scaling often adds extra overhead and hidden costs |
Cost efficiency
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Pricing models less adaptable to changing needs |
|
|
Extra charges for certain services create unpredictability |
|
|
Limited reporting makes budget oversight harder |
Integration capabilities
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Broad but shallow integration network with limited automation |
|
|
Manual steps still required for onboarding and device management |
|
|
Few workflow customization options compared to API-driven systems |
Environmental responsibility
|
GroWrk |
Workwize |
|
|
Basic disposal with minimal sustainability focus |
|
|
No structured buyback or value recovery programs |
|
|
Limited visibility into end-of-life reporting, making ESG tracking harder |
Adaptable
"GroWrk is open to continual improvement of their product, and open to honest constructive feedback. Their platform and user experience has kept getting better and better over the almost year I have been using them. They have really helped us get hardware in the hands of our growing company in a timely manner. Special shoutout to our CSM & IT team for their willingness to be there every step of the way."
Global Solution
"Through their processes and the stewardship of your account/customer success manager - you can expect a consistent experience across your geographic footprint. My team members whether they are in Chile, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Urugay, etc - I can expect they'll receive similar service and Growrk effectively functions like an extension of my team. This applies to onboarding new employees, collections and returns for repairs or offboarding at the end of an employee tenure."
Stability
“The efforts of GroWrk's logistics team have been instrumental in bringing stability to our asset management, ensuring that everything is under control. Their support has made a significant difference in maintaining the consistency and efficiency of our operations.”
Advanced
"Their platform and user experience has kept getting better and better over the almost year I have been using them. They have really helped us get hardware in the hands of our growing company in a timely manner. Special shoutout to our CSM & IT team for their willingness to be there every step of the way."
Efficiency
“With GroWrk employees get their laptops right from the start. Equipment goes into our device management system. We can monitor our inventory and assign or pull back equipment as needed. It’s been a huge time saver and a big stress reduction.”
Responsive
"The team and my account manager are always quick to respond, flexible, and transparent with how they resolve our needs.
GroWrk has done a great job at being the leader in expanding their scope for the places I need equipment purchased, stored, and maintained. I've had experiences of employees who are remote and traveling in all sorts of locations be able to get replacement equipment in a convenient way because of GroWrk's wide network and quick responsiveness."
Intuitive
"GroWrk has been a great solution for managing IT equipment for our teams across LATAM. GroWrk has helped streamline some of our processes for deploying devices to team members in different locations. The platform is easy to navigate, and the ability to track inventory remotely is helpful."
Bring one upcoming onboarding/offboarding and we'll show exact SLAs and costs in minutes.
1] G2 – Multiple mentions: implementation "months longer," SLAs rarely met outside US; painful global collection; portal updates lacking. (Dec 2024–Jul 2025)
[2] G2 – Slower LATAM/APAC pickups; need more depots; limited storefront customization (May–Jul 2025)
[3] Capterra – "No link between Workwize order and supplier order," "no meaningful updates," slow serial-number updates (Feb 2025)
[4] Capterra – Limited auto-onboarding/API; limited offboarding geos (Jan 2025)
[5] G2 – Reports of bugs in asset views (May 2025)
[6] Reddit r/ITManagers – Practitioner comments on 30% product markups + platform fees; others opted for CDW; general "overlay margin + delays" theme (2025)